Why are the Birthers the ones being labeled “Racists”?

In his book, Obama says that Grandmother “Tut,” did not want a black son-in-law, and that his Grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama “didn’t want the Obama blood sullied by a white woman.”

Barry was birthed in diametrically opposing targets of racism, white vs. black, and black vs. white.

His mother perhaps believed color was not an issue in human relations. But her influence on him evaporated when she sent him back to Hawaii, and as a 10 year old, the feelings of abandonment festered. As nature abhors a vacuum, so does the soul. A race agitating, communist Frank Marshall Davis took this young psychologically impressionable boy and befriended him, as Obama looks back fondly on him, “It made me smile, thinking back on Frank and his old Black Power, dashiki self.” Davis built up the young Obama’s sense of “Black Pride,” until he became more black than the 50% white of his birth. As he said, “I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.”

How this effected the transformation from Tut’s Barry, to Frank’s Barrack is seen in his own words, “I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.” In all his rhetoric he wants whites to see things from a black perspective, but what perspective does he take, “I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela.”

The fact is that racism plays a crucial role in the identity of Obama, but it is not the white mans racism that does, rather it is the racism that soothed his soul at the loss felt of being without his mother. This same racism has been kept alive in him and sold to us all for 30 years, by the race baiter’s like Reverends Jackson, Sharpton and Wright. This same permutation of racism is what built Obama’s political career.

How he responds to any real or perceived act of racism is found in another of his most basic identities, the faith he grew up in. I believe that Obama believes he is a Christian, but he is also Muslim, as he was also born a Muslim and raised as a Muslim until ten. These influences have an effect that resonates later in life, “I will stand with them (the Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” This statement leaves little room for ambiguity, it leaves no room for reason. It is reaction, reaction conditioned to what his mind is perceiving, a reaction to anything that threatens his identity.

As a supposedly Constitutional lawyer, he should have known that the basic premise of the Constitution is that the rule of law must be preserved. That means wait until all the evidence is presented before rendering a judgment. Nevertheless, Obama cannot wait, his quest to have his needs fulfilled has become both a psychological and emotional addiction for him. And, like most addicts needing a fix, the drugs are talking, not a person of sound mind. Obama’s drug of choice is racism. He needs racism, without it he is just a lonely little boy looking to be loved. The longer between fixes, the more quickly and violently the addict lunges for the drug.

Addictions can be cured. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. However, recovery cannot take place while the addict immerses himself in an environment of enablers. Obama’s supporters are like the mother of a drunk who cannot admit that her “baby” has a problem, instead of confronting the one they love with his destructive behavior they enable him to continue by casting the blame on others. “Just drop that girl and your life will be better,” or “he is going through a lot of problems with his marriage,” or countless other excuses are heard from the mouth of the enablers of an addict. Enablers perpetuate the addiction either by denying a problem exists or by continuing to feed the addict his drug.

From the mouths of Obama’s enablers, those who oppose anything about him, his policies, or qualifications to be President are RACISTS. We are racists, simply because this is Barry’s drug of choice and they are simply feeding him more.

Eventually the excuses stop working, as the addict or his enablers cannot find sympathy for his destructive actions. Sooner or later the addict’s actions become so egregious that they can no longer be ignored. Has this moment happened in a reaction to an event in Cambridge?

There are only two choices for addicts, recovery or destruction. Those that love the addict have to chose recovery, but those who also feed on the addicts addiction choose to let the addict go to his destruction.

Many Obots have written to us calling us racists. My question to them is to understand if they love Obama, are they going to stop being Obama’s enablers and see the real problem, or are they just going to hang on to share in the high of the next fix?