The Devil makes some Damned Deals


John McCain, Hero to Zero at Mach 6.66


The election of 2008 was the election where Americans went to the polls to supposedly vote for a natural-born citizen, but a sample of the candidates reveals anything but, three candidates either had constitutionally disqualifying or unknown places of birth. Rger Calero born in Nicaragua, John Sidney McCain born in Panama, and Barrack Hussein Obama, II born in ??????

Here we have two people who we know without a doubt did not meet the first test of a natural born citizen, which is born in the country. Both Calero and McCain were born in Central America. For Calero there is a green card and for McCain there is a birth certificate, but with Barrack Hussein Obama, II we simply do not know with certainty if he even passes the first test of being a natural born citizen, because we have no definitive proof that he was born in the great State of Hawaii. All we have for him is an image on the internet of two Certificates of Live Birth and Hawaiian officials telling us that his records are on file in accordance to their laws.


How could this Constitutional train wreck happen? After much thought, it saddens us that we must say that the main enabler of this debacle was Senator John McCain. At McCain’s feet lies the root of this crisis.    



Senator McCain


Many of us here at are veterans like Senator McCain, in this we have a unanimous consensus that John S. McCain is a true hero, and has undergone tremendous hardships for this country. As an Admiral’s son, he could have easily found safety stateside during the Vietnam. He went through hell and came back. This is what disturbs us the most, his career and reputation was built upon noble deeds, and not a literary invention.


Lt. Cdr. John McCain


When we heard that John McCain was pronounced a natural-born citizen by Senate Proclamation 511 on April 10, 2008, because he was born of two American Citizen Parents on a military base under the American flag, in the Panama Canal Zone, which was under the jurisdiction of the United States we felt comfortable that he was for all intent and purposes of our Founding Fathers a natural-born citizen.  What is more with this resolution we thought the Senate had done its 20th Amendment duties.


Around late July and early August 2008 rumors stated to come out about Barack Hussein Obama, II’s lack of natural-born status. The release of his questionable Certificate of Live Birth didn’t put our worries to rest. Even before this time McCain was starting to be challenged in court, by Fred Hollander. Even though many of us supported John as a patriot and believed he was a natural-born citizen, we seen that Obama’s supporters were challenging McCain and while we doubted they would win, we figured that with them investigating McCain we could investigate Obama and together we would make sure that a natural-born citizen would be elected to the Office of the President as the Founding Fathers wanted. 


We heard that Hollander had acquired and released McCain’s birth certificate to the court and the court had dismissed the case.  Slowly some facts coming from the this case started coming to light around October. Some of these facts while not easily provable were starting to be disturbing. 


What was even more disturbing was John McCain’s silence on the questions surrounding Barrack Obama’s eligibility questions. Two things just did not make sense, first looking at McCain as a patriot we had to wonder why he would allow someone even try to enter the oval office if they were not qualified, and from a purely human nature perspective since his qualifications were challenged and his birth certificate released and made public by the plaintiff Hollander would he also demand Barrack Obama do the same. McCain’s silence in this matter started to make us think, ………. 



What is caught in your throat John?


At this time Phil Berg who filed the initial lawsuit against Obama was denied on a technicality, and election time was fast approaching.  With the last weeks approaching some of us had concerns about McCain’s eligibility, but we were seriously worried about Obama’s eligibility. 


After reading and researching the outstanding work of Professor Gabriel J. Chin, in his work “11 months and a hundred yards short of citizenship,” we began to understand what was caught in John’s throat. Reviewing the facts Professor Chin presents it is clear that John McCain was not born under the American flag on a military base in the Canal Zone, in fact he was not born in the Canal Zone. The Colon Hospital was built by the Panama Railroad Company in the city of Colon, which was under the Panamanian flag.  There is an interesting tidbit of history that only military personnel would understand. The Colon Hospital was responsible for the “sanitary health” of the “working women” of Colon who provided “comfort” to the servicemen and canal workers during that time. The Panamanian police were responsible for insuring that these ladies went to the hospital. This alone is one big red flag as to this hospital being on a military base, and for Colon in general being a part of the Canal Zone.  


John McCain was born of two American parents and this makes him without a doubt an American Citizen, but Colon is a sovereign part of Panama.  It is as simple as looking on a map.


Colon Hospital Circled in red inside Panamanian Territory


Today Panama is a country that confers citizenship via jus soli, which if he was born there today would mean that John McCain would not born with only American claims to his allegiance. BUT, in 1936 Panama’s sole principle of birthright citizenship was jus sanguinis. Yes, Panama did include in their Constitution an avenue of Panamanian citizenship John McCain could have used, but it was not an automatic birthright.



The point is that Panama made no claim to John’s allegiance at his birth, John was born with only the United States of America having a claim to his allegiance. Unlike Obama who was claimed at birth as a subject by her royal Britannic Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The fact is that Kenya has a stronger claim on Obama than Panama had on McCain. On December 13, 1963, Barrack Hussein Obama, II was a citizen of Kenya and the United States. Only until August 5, 1984 could Obama loose Kenyan citizenship. McCain lost his chance at Panama citizenship on August 30, 1952. Obama kept Kenyan citizenship at least two years after his 21st birthday, while McCain was prohibited from having Panamanian citizenship 5 years before his 21st birthday.


We need to point out that a natural born citizen of the United States is one who is defined as such at birth. If we look at John Jay’s letter concerning the need of the Commander in Chief being a natural born citizen then, we can see that Jay wanted to exclude Foreigners, who by definition have allegiances to a foreign power.


Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen. John Jay


 This necessity to prevent foreign powers is also supported by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers Number 68.


“Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one querter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?” Alexander Hamilton


John McCain did not need the Senate to lie for him, as he could have effectively argued that that the purpose of the natural born citizen clause was to keep out those born with foreign claims to their allegiance.  He could have demonstrated a knowledge of our founding fathers that would have shown he understood the Constitution and the reasoning that our Founding Fathers poured into it. 


When we add up both Jay and Hamilton we arrive at only one definition for a natural born citizen that satisfies their concerns, and that is Vattel’s definition in Book One, Chapter 19,


212. Of the citizens and natives. 


The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.


Does this mean that John McCain is not a natural born citizen, if we accept the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States codified Vattel in our Federal Common Law, then the answer is no.


"When the United States declared their independence, they were bound to receive the law of nations, in its modern state of purity and refinement." Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199, 281 (1796) (Wilson, J.). In the years of the early Republic, this law of nations comprised two principal elements, the first covering the general norms governing the behavior of national states with each other: "the science which teaches the rights subsisting between nations or states, and the obligations correspondent to those rights," E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Preliminaries 3 (J. Chitty et al. transl. and ed. 1883) (hereinafter Vattel) (footnote omitted), or "that code of public instruction which defines the rights and prescribes the duties of nations, in their intercourse with each other," 1 James Kent Commentaries *1. This aspect of the law of nations thus occupied the executive and legislative domains, not the judicial.


The experts Olsen and Tribe, are not so expert as they think. They needed to convolute the law, when all what MCain needed was there in front of them.  As we see the Supreme Court had ruled that the Law of Nations by Vattel was given to us, so let us revisit Vattel.  


Also in Book One, Chapter 19 we find,


217. Children born in the armies of the state.


For the same reasons also, children born out of the country, in the armies of the state, or in the house of its minister at a foreign court, are reputed born in the country; for a citizen who is absent with his family, on the service of the state, but still dependent on it, and subject to its jurisdiction, cannot be considered as having quitted its territory.


Since John McCain was born of two American citizen parents, and who by definition of the Law of Nations that the Supreme Court of the United States says is the foundation of our Federal Common Law, they did not quit the country, John McCain’s birth would meet the definition of Vattel’s definition found in 212. Of the citizens and natives. What is more since McCain was born without Panamanian citizenship he satisfies the concerns of the founding fathers, both John Jay and Alexander Hamilton.  


If John McCain had competent legal council instead of political legal council and allowed this to go to the Supreme Court there is without a doubt that he would have been found to be a natural born citizen as required under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States.


If John McCain was honest with the American people and showed them that he understood the intent of the Framers he would have won the day. But what did the Senator do? He displayed cowardice in the face of the enemies of our beloved Constitution.




As a former Captain in the United States Navy, John knows what a Captain’s Mast is. It is time that John receives some NJP (non judicial punishment) from us his brothers in arms.


We the military members of the Birthers charge John Sidney McCain, III with abandoning his sacred oath taken as an ensign in the service of his Country to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic,  and making a deal with the devil because he did not keep the faith and hold true to his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.  




The following is the timeline from when McCain’s natural born status was first questioned, until his fellow conspirators in the Senate made him a natural born citizen.


February 4, 2008 Is John McCain a Panama Citizen?

February 12, 2008 NY Moderated Times Blog

February 28, 2008 McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out

February 28, 2008 Senator McCaskill introduces the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act

March 1, 2008 McCain Was Born in the Panama Canal Zone. So?

March 12, 2008 McCain Returns to New Hampshire

March 14, 2008 Fred Hollander files lawsuit against McCain

April 2, 2008 Chairman of the Judiciary takes DHS Secretary Chertoff off topic from prepared remarks to discuss the definition of natural born citizens

April 10, 2008 Senator McCaskill introduces Senate Resolution 511, to make John McCain a natural born citizen.

April 11, 2008 WSJ Clinton, Obama Agree: McCain’s a “Natural Born Citizen”

April 30, 2008 Senate Resolution 511 passes the senate by Unanimous Consent


Not once during this time did John McCain come before the American people and explain the circumstances of his birth or that the position he was taking was the same as Romney’s father, one being at least in the spirit of our founding fathers desire to only have a natural born citizen as commander in chief. 


Again, we stress John Jay’s letter to George Washington warning of the influence of Foreigners in the role of Commander in Chief.  Too many people think of a foreigner being born overseas, but to our founding fathers, a foreigner was a person who held a debt of allegiance to a foreign state. Thus, the phrase natural born citizen was used because a person who was naturally born a citizen of one country only had claim upon their natural allegiance by one country.  Since both McCain and George Romney were born in Panama and Mexico respectively, countries that at the time of their births only conveyed birthright citizenship by jus sanguinis they were in fact free of foreign claims of allegiance at their births.


We believe that if this was explained to the American people by McCain there would have been no need of a non-binding resolution from the senate that ultimately forced John McCain to become both a traitor to his oath and a fellow conspirator in the destruction of our nation.


After the non-binding resolution, there was a silence on the subject of natural born citizen from the political parties, the candidates and the media. What price was extracted from McCain and the Republican Party for this nonbinding resolution? McCain became a keeper of secrets, he and Obama much like pedophiles that can only share their secrets with each other because they can not share them openly.  




People ask why didn’t the Republican Party speak out? The answer is simple they became coconspirators of the theft of our republic.  Were they actually complicit or did they see what the Democrats and MSM did to Hillary Clinton? This is hard to say, we must imagine that not all Republicans were a part of this, if they were there would have been no need for Dick Cheney to silence any chance that some lone Republican might actually blurt out that Obama was born under the red, white and blue, and the American flag wasn’t the only flag with those colors. The elites most certainly didn’t want the truth to be known.



Some self described conservatives (aka CINO’s)  like Jon Henke want us to go away so they can debate “the big boy” issues. I hate to bust Pinky Henke’s little bubble, but we are discussing the big boy issues, because what we are fighting for is nothing less then the survival of the Constitutional Republic that is every American’s birthright, be they born as citizens or born anew as naturalized citizens. See Pinky Henke political parties have no Constitutional protections to dictate the fate of the Republic, we the people do. So we would appreciate it if you and your fellow CINO’s and RINO’s simply pick up your toys and go home and leave the adults alone to do what needs to be done.   


After the recent videos exposing ACORN as willing to facilitate child prostitution we seen John McCain voted “present” to defund ACORN. What kind of leadership is that. He promised us “continued leadership,” if he was elected President, so we can only imagine what that would have been now. That particular stand just didn’t sit right, so a little investigation brought up another name, Gyrgy Schwartz, also known as George Sorros. George Sorros is perhaps the biggest single contributor to ACORN before Barrack Obama took that honor with our money.  John McCain’s Reform Institute for Campaign and Election Issues was funded by George Sorros’ Open Society Institute. The web of Non-profit, non-government agencies under George Sorros’ control spent close to 140 million dollars to help John McCain and Russ Feingold pass the McCain-Feingold Act of 2002 that outlawed free political speech. In 2000 John McCain gave the keynote address at what the late Robert Novak described as the Sorros Convention in Philadelphia.  The answer to why John McCain align himself with George Sorros who said, “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United State,” appears to be the answer of why John McCain never questioned the lack of constitutional eligibility of Barrack Hussein Obama, II.  



John McCain has shown us through his CINO and RINO surrogates that they will resort to finger pointing at us and others who dare to speak out for the truth. Look at how McCain was quick to point the finger at Joe Wilson for doing the unthinkable in a congressional chamber, he spoke the truth. He called Obama exactly what he is, a liar. What did John McCain say about Joe Wilson?   He said Joe Wilson was “totally disrespectful.” Lying to the American people is what is totally disrespectful, but it appears that this simply doesn’t phase John McCain.   





It is easy to point the finger at us, after all who are we, but the denizens of the “turf” the political parties play Mafia Wars over.  This nation, this great nation is more then who controls the reigns of power for a time. Power without truth and consent behind it becomes nothing more than a coercive power, but in time truth all by its self becomes an unstoppable force.


We at have given the American people factual answers to the question posed by Oborters and Main Stream Media as to why Hilliary Clinton nor John McCain raised the questions about Barrack Hussien Obama, II’s eligibility.  They may not like it, but it is going to be hard for them to dispute the facts. The truth is that there was a conspiracy to elect a foreigner to the office of Commander in Chief, and they are damn determined to try and get away with it.    


For a brief moment John McCain had truth on his side, but did he allow that truth speak for him? Sadly, he let people who lied for him seal his fate. John McCain could have used himself to remind this nation what it is starting to learn now, and that is the office of Commander and Chief can only be entrusted to someone who by the nature of their birth is born with one and only one loyalty and that is to the United States. Someone who is not entangled by foreign influences. John McCain could have broken free from Sorros’ foreign entanglements he found himself in.   


Here is our question to John McCain. What is history going to remember you by? Will you be remembered as the man who made a mistake and like the Phoenix of your home state rose out of the ashes and be the hero you once were, by doing the right thing? Or will you be forever known as the hero who went to zero at mach 6.66? The choice John McCain is yours and yours alone.  


September 16, 2009